Author Topic: New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com  (Read 522 times)

culturejam

  • Electron Doctor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4302
  • Function f(x)
    • View Profile
New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com
« on: July 05, 2018, 08:39:44 AM »

Boba7

  • Electron Doctor
  • *****
  • Posts: 712
    • View Profile
Re: New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2018, 09:37:22 AM »
Great! Thanks for sharing

EBK

  • Electron Doctor
  • *****
  • Posts: 812
  • Eric K.
    • View Profile
Re: New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2018, 12:15:04 PM »
Nice!  Bookmarked. Thanks! 
Not affiliated with Oatey, makers of the world's best and most delicious* low tar solder paste. Ask for Oatey -- It's the juiciest!

*Solder paste is not food.  If ingested, seek medical help promptly.

diablochris6

  • Electron Doctor
  • *****
  • Posts: 822
    • View Profile
Re: New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2018, 12:33:17 PM »
Fantastic! Thanks for pointing this link out!
Build guides of my original designs and modifications here

cooder

  • Electron Doctor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1870
  • Stephan Nelson / New Zealand / Aotearoa
    • View Profile
Re: New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2018, 02:53:00 PM »
That's a very well written article, not that I'm an expert, just thinking....
BigNoise Amplification

chromesphere

  • Electron Doctor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2125
  • Paul
    • View Profile
    • Chromesphere
Re: New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2018, 10:28:44 PM »
That pt2395 has me interested :D I wonder why people arent using it for projects.
.                    
Pedal Parts Shop            Youtube

somnif

  • Electron Doctor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1173
    • View Profile
Re: New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com
« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2018, 10:33:37 PM »
That pt2395 has me interested :D I wonder why people arent using it for projects.

I know Danelectro has used it in one of their echos, and I swear I've seen at least one older DIY design using it ( http://www.sdiy.org/destrukto/vc-echo.html ). I imagine its largely a case of "what on earth do I do with this 40 pin monstrosity" in the DIY world, not to mention its harder to lay hands on than the 2399.

alanp

  • Electron Doctor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4965
    • View Profile
    • http://alanp.info/
Re: New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2018, 10:53:16 PM »
The 2395 has a longer delay, and a cleaner sound to it. I've got a module that uses it.

Harder to work with, though. More real estate is needed, plus that additional RAM chip.

The 2399 is a good compromise, for most guitar applications.
"Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper."
- Cohen the Barbarian, on what is greatest in life
My OSHpark shared projects
My website

selfdestroyer

  • skilled electronics ninja master
  • Electron Doctor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4673
  • Cody - Fresno CA USA
    • View Profile
    • My Blog
Re: New PT2399 analysis from ElectroSmash.com
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2018, 09:54:54 AM »
Awesome! Thanks for the share.