madbeanpedals::forum

General => Open Discussion => Topic started by: icecycle66 on February 05, 2015, 06:22:03 PM

Title: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: icecycle66 on February 05, 2015, 06:22:03 PM
If this was discussed, then I missed it.

What's going on with the transition from 4001 to 5817 as the power protect diode?
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: Leevibe on February 05, 2015, 06:27:25 PM
Somebody can correct me, but I think it's because you can put the 5817 in series with the power rail and suffer almost no voltage drop.
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: midwayfair on February 05, 2015, 06:30:55 PM
4001 is used in a "crowbar" formation, where it goes between +9V and ground, with the cathode pointed toward +9V. It shunts the voltage if you plug in the wrong polarity power supply -- which protects the components but will create a situation where your power supply can supply enough current to eventually (and by "eventually" I mean "very quickly in real life") destroy the diode, creating a dead short to ground. However, a battery can't supply enough current to kill a 4001, so it works to protect the components if you momentarily connect the battery the wrong way around. The worst that happens then is you drain the battery a little.

Using a 1n5817 in series with the power supply means that if you connect the wrong polarity of power supply, you will simply get no voltage passing, because the diode will block it completely. The price you pay is the loss of a trivial amount of voltage (0.2V in this case).

When people were powering their effects mostly with batteries, using the crowbar method with the 4001 was perfectly acceptable because it did exactly what was needed and sacrificed no voltage, which could matter when the battery became particularly drained. Now, though, almost no one uses batteries, especially in DIY pedals, so it's better to just use the way that won't kill a pedal.
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: mandrewbot3k on February 05, 2015, 06:37:17 PM
Quote from: midwayfair on February 05, 2015, 06:30:55 PM
4001 is used in a "crowbar" formation, where it goes between +9V and ground, with the cathode pointed toward +9V. It shunts the voltage if you plug in the wrong polarity power supply -- which protects the components but will create a situation where your power supply can supply enough current to eventually (and by "eventually" I mean "very quickly in real life") destroy the diode, creating a dead short to ground. However, a battery can't supply enough current to kill a 4001, so it works to protect the components if you momentarily connect the battery the wrong way around. The worst that happens then is you drain the battery a little.

Using a 1n5817 in series with the power supply means that if you connect the wrong polarity of power supply, you will simply get no voltage passing, because the diode will block it completely. The price you pay is the loss of a trivial amount of voltage (0.2V in this case).

When people were powering their effects mostly with batteries, using the crowbar method with the 4001 was perfectly acceptable because it did exactly what was needed and sacrificed no voltage, which could matter when the battery became particularly drained. Now, though, almost no one uses batteries, especially in DIY pedals, so it's better to just use the way that won't kill a pedal.

Why the switch to the 5817 though? Just lower forward voltage than the 4001?
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: midwayfair on February 05, 2015, 07:17:33 PM
Quote from: mandrewbot3k on February 05, 2015, 06:37:17 PM
Why the switch to the 5817 though? Just lower forward voltage than the 4001?

Yes, and because they're different types of diodes with different purposes.
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: mandrewbot3k on February 05, 2015, 08:03:28 PM
Quote from: midwayfair on February 05, 2015, 07:17:33 PM
Quote from: mandrewbot3k on February 05, 2015, 06:37:17 PM
Why the switch to the 5817 though? Just lower forward voltage than the 4001?

Yes, and because they're different types of diodes with different purposes.
I guess I meant, why wouldnt the 4001 work in series? just too big of a Vdrop?
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: rullywowr on February 05, 2015, 10:07:51 PM

Quote from: mandrewbot3k on February 05, 2015, 08:03:28 PM
Quote from: midwayfair on February 05, 2015, 07:17:33 PM
Quote from: mandrewbot3k on February 05, 2015, 06:37:17 PM
Why the switch to the 5817 though? Just lower forward voltage than the 4001?

Yes, and because they're different types of diodes with different purposes.
I guess I meant, why wouldnt the 4001 work in series? just too big of a Vdrop?

Exactly. 1n4xxx have a 1.0V voltage drop. 
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: icecycle66 on February 05, 2015, 10:47:05 PM
Thanks guys.
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: chromesphere on February 06, 2015, 01:33:26 AM
Made this video about a year ago on the topic.  pros and cons to both methods I guess:

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-OYXdKMG8s


Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: mandrewbot3k on February 06, 2015, 02:21:22 AM
Quote from: chromesphere on February 06, 2015, 01:33:26 AM
Made this video about a year ago on the topic.  pros and cons to both methods I guess:

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-OYXdKMG8s



Edit: ^ Those were thumbs up on my iPad. Apparently that didnt come across that way on the PC.
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: chromesphere on February 07, 2015, 09:37:49 PM
lol no worries mate, i saw the thumps up though :D
Title: Re: 1N4001 vs 1N5817
Post by: Matopotato on January 27, 2023, 11:00:03 PM
Quote from: midwayfair on February 05, 2015, 06:30:55 PM
4001 is used in a "crowbar" formation, where it goes between +9V and ground, with the cathode pointed toward +9V. It shunts the voltage if you plug in the wrong polarity power supply -- which protects the components but will create a situation where your power supply can supply enough current to eventually (and by "eventually" I mean "very quickly in real life") destroy the diode, creating a dead short to ground. However, a battery can't supply enough current to kill a 4001, so it works to protect the components if you momentarily connect the battery the wrong way around. The worst that happens then is you drain the battery a little.

Using a 1n5817 in series with the power supply means that if you connect the wrong polarity of power supply, you will simply get no voltage passing, because the diode will block it completely. The price you pay is the loss of a trivial amount of voltage (0.2V in this case).

When people were powering their effects mostly with batteries, using the crowbar method with the 4001 was perfectly acceptable because it did exactly what was needed and sacrificed no voltage, which could matter when the battery became particularly drained. Now, though, almost no one uses batteries, especially in DIY pedals, so it's better to just use the way that won't kill a pedal.
Years ago, but thanks!