madbeanpedals::forum

Projects => General Questions => Topic started by: greysun on February 20, 2023, 02:54:14 PM

Title: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: greysun on February 20, 2023, 02:54:14 PM
Okay, okay, okay - but hear me out... lol...

As I get my pedal board narrowed and finessed a bit (I've built over 3 dozen pedals at this point), I'm finding that of the muffs I've built, I prefer the 4 transistor versions (mudbunnies) over the op-amp versions (pig butt, and an actual EH big muff). Part of it is that Brian's docs encouraged experimentation and I was able to make something that sounded a bit fatter and louder than the IC ones with a bit more character...

Then I started looking at my slow loris - I have what I think is the 2012 version, which I had to dig for the documentation on - the new version has switching to different clipping diodes (mine is a board-mounted switch, no clipping center, LEDs up, diodes down - I almost always use the LEDs up). It's a great pedal, but can be finicky in the mix. I also built 2 Runts, but they don't have the same feel of the Slow Loris.

Then I thought: ya know - this uses an op-amp (lm308, I think?)... can one make a transistor version that might have different characteristics? So I went to the internet, and found more articles about how nobody knows the original circuits or conflicting information and blah blah blah... nothing specific enough for my question.

So I come to you, madbean forum, to see if anyone's tried it - I don't know enough about circuits to know where the op-amp sits in terms of affecting the character of the pedal, but in the spirit of experimentation, why not?

Any info is appreciated. :-)
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: jimilee on February 20, 2023, 02:58:50 PM
Quote from: greysun on February 20, 2023, 02:54:14 PM
Okay, okay, okay - but hear me out... lol...

As I get my pedal board narrowed and finessed a bit (I've built over 3 dozen pedals at this point), I'm finding that of the muffs I've built, I prefer the 4 transistor versions (mudbunnies) over the op-amp versions (pig butt, and an actual EH big muff). Part of it is that Brian's docs encouraged experimentation and I was able to make something that sounded a bit fatter and louder than the IC ones with a bit more character...

Then I started looking at my slow loris - I have what I think is the 2012 version, which I had to dig for the documentation on - the new version has switching to different clipping diodes (mine is a board-mounted switch, no clipping center, LEDs up, diodes down - I almost always use the LEDs up). It's a great pedal, but can be finicky in the mix. I also built 2 Runts, but they don't have the same feel of the Slow Loris.

Then I thought: ya know - this uses an op-amp (lm308, I think?)... can one make a transistor version that might have different characteristics? So I went to the internet, and found more articles about how nobody knows the original circuits or conflicting information and blah blah blah... nothing specific enough for my question.

So I come to you, madbean forum, to see if anyone's tried it - I don't know enough about circuits to know where the op-amp sits in terms of affecting the character of the pedal, but in the spirit of experimentation, why not?

Any info is appreciated. :-)

That fat rat has a CMOS transistor. I have a Rat PCB with 8 different clipping options including CMOS transistors.
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: Aleph Null on February 20, 2023, 04:40:18 PM
A big port of the Rat's character is it's pre-clipping EQ. It has a very distinct, aggresssive EQ going into the diodes. If you replicate that, it should sound similar. Most transistors won't anywhere near the amount of gain available as an opamp (even the crappy one the Rat uses), but that may not matter, depending on the clipping diodes you use.

Has anyone done this before? Is there a schematic floating around somewhere? Not that I know of.
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: greysun on February 20, 2023, 04:57:23 PM
Quote from: Aleph Null on February 20, 2023, 04:40:18 PM
A big port of the Rat's character is it's pre-clipping EQ. It has a very distinct, aggresssive EQ going into the diodes. If you replicate that, it should sound similar. Most transistors won't anywhere near the amount of gain available as an opamp (even the crappy one the Rat uses), but that may not matter, depending on the clipping diodes you use.

Has anyone done this before? Is there a schematic floating around somewhere? Not that I know of.

The more I read, I'm finding most folks trying to find LM308 replacements because it's not made anymore - I have one or 2 extra of those, so that's not my goal necessarily... not knowing enough about these circuits, the gain is a mystery to me (and I'm sure far many before me have tried this route as 308s became hard to come by) - but maybe since the 308 is a single op-amp, there's a dual, or even triple NPN transistor combo that could approximate to the gain level?

Quote from: jimilee on February 20, 2023, 02:58:50 PM
That fat rat has a CMOS transistor. I have a Rat PCB with 8 different clipping options including CMOS transistors.

I'm not familiar with the fat rat schematic - do you have more info or a schematic to check out?

Also, thank you both for the replies so far. :-)
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: BricksnBeatles on February 20, 2023, 06:02:49 PM
Quote from: Aleph Null on February 20, 2023, 04:40:18 PM
Most transistors won't anywhere near the amount of gain available as an opamp

Darlington?
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: thomasha on February 20, 2023, 06:23:07 PM
What about discrete OpAmps?
https://hackaday.io/project/176860-homemade-operational-amplifier (https://hackaday.io/project/176860-homemade-operational-amplifier)
It seems there is a 4558 tube screamer kind of pedal
https://www.parasitstudio.se/stripboard-layouts/discrete-tube-reamer (https://www.parasitstudio.se/stripboard-layouts/discrete-tube-reamer)
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: Aleph Null on February 20, 2023, 07:11:16 PM
Quote from: BricksnBeatles on February 20, 2023, 06:02:49 PM
Quote from: Aleph Null on February 20, 2023, 04:40:18 PM
Most transistors won't anywhere near the amount of gain available as an opamp

Darlington?

A darlington could get you there, but honestly, it might not be necessary. I've never seen any one run a Rat with the gain all the way up. The other approach would be to select diodes with a forward voltage that has been reduced by the same percentage as the total gain. That would reduce the total output, but you could fix that by changing the JFET buffer into a recovery gain stage. The output impedance won't be quite as low, but that shouldn't matter too much.
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: Bio77 on February 20, 2023, 08:09:58 PM
Maybe take a look at the LM308 schematic in the data sheet for some clues. Theres a lot in there that isn't used in the Rat.

https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/lt0108.pdf (https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/lt0108.pdf)

Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: jwin615 on February 20, 2023, 08:15:09 PM
The Katzenkönig is kinda that.  See the Aion Poseidon
https://aionfx.com/project/poseidon-silicon-fuzz/
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: jimilee on February 20, 2023, 09:34:40 PM
Quote from: jimilee on February 20, 2023, 02:58:50 PM
That fat rat has a CMOS transistor. I have a Rat PCB with 8 different clipping options including CMOS transistors.

I'm not familiar with the fat rat schematic - do you have more info or a schematic to check out?

Also, thank you both for the replies so far. :-)
[/quote]

Here's a great thread over at DIYSB. https://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic.php?t=27632

Here is my implementation
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: greysun on February 21, 2023, 12:23:12 AM
Thanks, Jimilee! man, that looks like a fun pedal. I'll read that thread shortly... Are there particular clipping settings you prefer with that pedal? Is it, in fact, fatter/louder overall?

It's kinda fun to dig into this a bit... I had no idea RAT and subsequent clones/iterations had such lore. I'm intrigued by a darlington transistor (thank you, Bricksnbeatles), but have no idea where to start... if you or anyone knows, I'm game to breadboard something up!

I guess after looking at the data sheets (thank you BIO77), I'm still a bit intrigued at how the IC muff came about - from what I'm reading, it uses 3 gain stages using 2 ICs (as opposed to 4 gain stages using 4 transistors for the originals - someone correct me if that's not right). Fully realizing that the op-amp and original muffs do *not* sound the same (probably because the ICs produce more gain, BUT...), they still have a similar flavor.

I guess what I'm after isn't an exact RAT sound, but everything online that I'm finding is trying to mimic the lm308 or play with the clipping diodes (which I also want to do! hehe, but I'd love to go further).

Great stuff here - I'll do some sleuthing, but keep it coming if you have knowledge on it...
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: jimilee on February 21, 2023, 12:39:18 AM
I'm digging the opamp sound and the turbo rat. Look up the deucetone rat. I have a PCB for that as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: matmosphere on February 21, 2023, 08:44:43 AM
Maybe you could find some answers here as well. Even if not it's an interesting read

http://www.righto.com/2016/12/inside-lm108-op-amp-superbeta.html?m=1

I would probably start by taking a transistor fuzz design I liked the sound of and start slicing the two circuits together.  Maybe even start with the Electra distortion with the tone control and output section of the rat.
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: greysun on February 21, 2023, 01:45:01 PM
super cool... always fun to look under the hood at these things from time to time - maybe I should try and get a can version of the 308 just to A/B test. Either way, this has been super helpful - thank you, all!

Before I start slicing and mixing schematics, I might start out trying to see what the different op-amps would do to the sound (op07, 741, 071, 301, 3130 - I read through this thread ( https://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/index.php?topic=127757.0 (https://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/index.php?topic=127757.0) ) and am curious to see what it does), and for those ICs with external slew adjustment I might adjust the ceramic cap (which may cut off wanted, or accentuate unwanted, frequencies, but all in the name of science, right?).

I never use the ruetz mod - I'm not looking for subtlety when I use this pedal, lol - so I might do away with the sweep pot altogether in favor of something like jimilee's 8-way switch with the clipping options (might not fit into a 1590B this way, but maybe a 125b is possible? I mean, if the Runt can go into a 1590A... Might need to cut the number of options down, find a smaller rotary switch, or get creative with several toggles, but that's a "later" problem) and then use the FatRat schematic since it seems like those mods can be switched off, as well.

TO THE BREADBOARD!!! Well, after I order a few parts... Thanks, everyone! If anyone has more info, always open to it! :-)
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: cspar on February 22, 2023, 03:58:30 AM
Here's a thread that works towards a transistor based approach towards a Rat.

https://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/index.php?topic=129355.40
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: greysun on February 23, 2023, 02:34:40 PM
Quote from: cspar on February 22, 2023, 03:58:30 AM
Here's a thread that works towards a transistor based approach towards a Rat.

https://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/index.php?topic=129355.40

Ha! It seems like they got something working, but are still trying to figure out some volume issues... I'll have to keep an eye on that. Again, the whole thing was just thinking of the transistor vs. op-amp muff and whether something like that would work for a RAT to get a little different flavor.

I like Jimilee's notion of creating something with a lot of clipping options. I was able to make a 1590B-sized single-sided PCB with board-mounted pot/switch placements. I based it on the Brian's schematic compared with the original schematic with the added (toggled) FatRat mods. Vol, Filter, Distortion, Fat (toggle), Clipping (1P8T rotary, 7 clipping + 1 no clipping. I did away with the Ruetz mod, I just don't use it and think the clipping options would be more flexible for me)... still need to get some of the more obscure parts, breadboard it, test it and etch it, but working toward solutions! hehe...

I also have to remember that the Slow Loris I have is 10+ years old now, and was the FIRST pedal I'd ever made. It has a lifted pad on the top layer (I guess the bottom pad is the one needed? lol) and isn't for the faint of heart when it comes to solder beauty. I looked at the schematic differences between Brian's now and the one I have, and there's a few parts he's taken out through the years that might explain some of the volume issues (an added 10k resistor, a pull down cap with the LED clipping diodes). When I look at Brian's schematic now compared to the original circuit, outside of the clipping options, it's effectively identical (a couple of power/biasing mods aside).

At any rate, I'll post the progress as I go along... As always, the madbean board proves it's the best for knowledge on this stuff! Thank you, all, once again!
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: greysun on February 24, 2023, 02:36:50 PM
Actually, I have one last question, pertaining to diodes...

In setting up a board for a switchable clipping diode option, I'm not sure the sizing needed for a few of them... e.g. a 4001 uses the same spacing as a resistor (I call it 4 hole spacing), while a 914 uses less (3 hole spacing).

While the following seem like they use 3-hole spacing based on internet photos, I don't want these standing up on the board... Anyone know the relative sizes for the following diodes:

- D9E
- 1N34A
- BAT41

As well, it seems like 914 and 4148 diodes have the same forward voltage and are used interchangeably at times... Does anyone know if there's an audible difference in sound for these?
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: jessenator on February 24, 2023, 03:03:08 PM
I'm rather new to all the standards, but these are they, apparently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-204 however, there are variations amongst manufacturers. I 3D printed a component lead bender just to make sure I'm being nice to the component itself: you fold it wrong and they break very easily (ask me how I know).

I measured a D9E and the glass casing measures 7.5mm, around the size of the "max" value on that wikipedia article for DO-7.
My ITT 1N34As measure around 7mm, in the mean.

This is where I bend them with that bending tool where the body fits most comfortably:
(https://i.imgur.com/FJCmobQ.jpg)

so whichever is closest to 12mm is what I'd do. Smaller diode leads can be bent to fit. Better for spacing to be too big than too small.

Also, some unsolicited advice: I would socket your germanium diodes (as much as I've bashed the single-strip machined socket headers).
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: greysun on February 24, 2023, 03:07:11 PM
Quote from: jessenator on February 24, 2023, 03:03:08 PM
I'm rather new to all the standards, but these are they, apparently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-204 however, there are variations amongst manufacturers. I 3D printed a component lead bender just to make sure I'm being nice to the component itself: you fold it wrong and they break very easily (ask me how I know).

I measured a D9E and the glass casing measures 7.5mm, around the size of the "max" value on that wikipedia article for DO-7.
My ITT 1N34As measure around 7mm, in the mean.

This is where I bend them with that bending tool where the body fits most comfortably:
(https://i.imgur.com/FJCmobQ.jpg)

so whichever is closest to 12mm is what I'd do. Smaller diode leads can be bent to fit. Better for spacing to be too big than too small.

Also, some unsolicited advice: I would socket your germanium diodes (as much as I've bashed the single-strip machined socket headers).

GREAT stuff! and I tend to socket anything that I think might need changing over time - diodes especially, so good call.

thank you! :-)
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: jessenator on February 24, 2023, 03:10:56 PM
No prob!
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: greysun on February 24, 2023, 03:16:58 PM
Quote from: jessenator on February 24, 2023, 03:10:56 PM
No prob!

AND if you feel like 3D printing another one of those lead-benders and shipping it to Chicago, I mean... I'd take one. ;-)

I have little to offer in return other than gratitude and some dollars for the trouble and shipping. hehe...
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: greysun on March 18, 2023, 06:10:24 PM
Just throwing out an update on this project... I got everything breadboarded to test out the different clipping options. (Similar to Jimilee, I'm making a version with an 8-way rotary - 7 options for clipping and 1 op-amp). Once I have the boards together, I can more easily record a video, but for now these were my findings... If there's an option floating around out there (and the parts are still available, hehe), Let me know... I'm open!

1. Silicone symmetrical options: I actually tried Schottkeys first... 5817s and BAT41s. 5817s was too quiet - BAT41s sounded better, but ultimately very similar to 4148/914s with a HAIR less volume, so I think I'll save the BAT41 for asymmetrical option. 4148 is a classic for the clippers, so why not? a little drop in volume, but a fuzzier and smoother sound than the straight op-amp.

2.  Germanium symmetrical options: 1n34a and D9V. D9Es are impossible to find, and I'm not sure why I couldn't get 1n60p, but I tried out D9V - cool sound, but definitely the quietest of the bunch, and 1n34a sounded similar with better volume, so it wins the germanium slot. The sound was unique - a little more gritty and dark, less fuzz-like - probably good for overdrive if you pull back the distortion level. Probably the most quiet of the bunch still...

3. LED symmetrical: Red, Yellow and Green were ones I liked (in that order), but Red ultimately wins out (though yellow was a close second - might socket this one). It's the perfect mix of all the best parts of the RAT sound - fuzzy tone (but not too fuzzy), great volume, good clarity but retaining the grit that makes it a RAT. (Of note, orange sounded the same as yellow to my ear and blue didn't change the sound at all, and since the forward voltages go red (1.7), orange (2.0), yellow (2.1), green (2.2), THEN blue (3.2) and upward for the other colors, I didn't even try others).

4. Asymmetrical option - silicone/schottkey mix: a 4001/bat41/bat41 combo sounded pretty good here - it's a little similar to the LED clipping, honestly, but it definitely has its own flavor, and I notice more of a difference with leads, which had more grit.

5. Silicone symmetrical #2: 4001s surprised me - I don't know why, but the sound was smooth and had decent volume. Definitely went more into fuzz territory, but felt more controlled and clear.

6. FET symmetrical option #1: I got some BS170s because they were in some of the original RATs - I combined it with 4148 and it produced something unique, so I'm into it. Hard to describe

7. FET symmetrical option #2: 2n7000s sounded pretty good. So did the BS170s, but the 2n7000s had a hair more volume and a bit more grit. Since the BS170s were already used with the 4148s, the 2n7000s win

8. op-amp clipping (e.g. no diodes or FETs): I was surprised by how different this sounded - more raw for sure... almost feels "incomplete" and I definitely prefer the clipping options, but it might be the most distinct of all the options, so it has earned its place. Perhaps great with the distortion rolled off and in overdrive territory.

Another interesting thing - I A/B'd with the Slow Loris from roughly 2012/2013 (clipping options were LED, none, 914, I think) - There are some circuit differences since then and the new version sounds clearer and louder - my testing was done with an OP07cp, but I'll throw a 308 in there for the final. In LED clipping mode, almost no difference in sound, but in op-amp or 914 mode, it was definitely different. Excited to get it going and boxed up!

I tested using the FAT RAT toggle, as well. I found that on neck pickups (single coil or humbuckers), the fat setting muffled things a bit more than I liked, but on bridge single coils it added just the right amount of thicker tone without changing the character of the pedal. This is more useful to me than the Ruetz mod, so I'm forgoing that altogether.

I initially asked about a transistor version of the RAT, but having FAT and clipping options (or knowing what options are out there) has done given me choices to customize the sound for me, so thank you madbean board for leading me that direction! More to follow on this and I'll hopefully do a video soon... and if you have other suggestions, please send them my way!
Title: Re: Possible dumb question: transistors instead of op-amp for Rat (slow loris)?
Post by: jimilee on March 18, 2023, 06:31:52 PM
1.2v zeners have a great sound, too. I was really surprised. I need to build another multi rat, I have mine to Dan. I still think the road kill rat was an awesome option, too. It's ideal for the opamp only selection.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk