Okay, so I ordered a batch of 100 Russian transistors (GT108V) and 20 GT402E and I want to build a rig on perf board to test them. I am following RG's article seen here:
http://www.geofex.com/article_folders/fuzzface/fffram.htm
An excellent article!!!
What I would like to do, is use my 1spot adapter which puts out about 9.4 volts but it is constant.
Do I have to adjust the resistors to make my DMM read the "correct" values at the end of the procedure?
Any advice or help with this project is much appreciated.
That should work just fine with your adapter. Not sure what you mean by "adjust the transistor" but considering the way ge's are sensitive to temperature that .4V over 9V should not make much of a difference if any at all. Just pop the transistors into their socket, let em settle, measure, do the math, and you should be good! Those Russian transistors are great. I have some GT109 that I like a lot and GT402's that are great too.
whoops!!! I meant resistors, I fixed it ;)
How many good sets did you get out of your batch?
you could use a 9volt regulator after the 1spot to get a stable voltage. and make sure you let them stabilize for a few minutes before writing the measurements as handling the transistors will add heat.
Okay, I got a big batch of Russian Germaniums and started to test some of them out. It is late and I need to ask some dumb questions.
I tested a bunch of them and am not quite sure I am doing it right.
RG method from his fuzz face article
I measure across the 2k7 resistor and got my first reading.
I then connected the 2.2M resistor and measure the DC across the 2k7 resistor again.
Is this correct? Am I measuring the 2k7 resistor both times?
Well I got these readings on a few:
The first number is the leakage and the second is the gain (if I am doing this right)
0.55 , 1.45
0.4 , 1.12
0.14 , 0.83
2.07 , 3.37
0.22 , 0.91
So would the first transistor have a gain of 90 hFe?
I figure this out right because I have 140 to test.
Help me Team!
This is the meter setting I am using. I want to make sure.
If you are using 2.2M and 2.49K resistors from what I understand, you multiply your readings by 100 then subtract one number from the other.
So (1.45 - 0.55) * 100 = 90
So you are correct.
RG thinks that any leakage over 500uA is bad. What's the leakage on this one?
0.55/2472 = 0.000222 = 222uA
So anything up to 1.23V on the leakage side is 'usable'.
So the second transistor is also somewhat leaky and the fourth one is faulty.
But you'll need to adjust for your resistor values, as this is approximate.
( Edited to clarify leaky transistors )
Isnt the first tranny getting close to "too leaky" as well?
So I have a multimeter that tests transistors... this does not test for leakage though, correct?
Is this method that RG describes as accurate as a bought transistor testing device?
For those of you that have bought large quantities of transistors off ebay or something... how are they?
Any of you sell them?
Thanks Plesur, that is a huge help. Good to know I am somewhat on the right track.
Claytushaywood, if you haven't read the RG keen article above, Do It, I found it really helpful. New/cheaper multimeters don't really test for leakage or account for it AFAIK.
This is my first batch of tranny's off of ebay so I will post the gains I get. Don't know how many good ones I will get so I won't offer to sell any hahaha.
cool! let me know! yeh i had just been reading it. though i was dozing off and my comprehension was awful.
but yeh, let us know about how it turned out.
Okay so here is what I got for GT402E, I ordered 20 of them and I believe 19 are useable.
The third number is the Hfe
1. 0.16, 1.01, 85
2. 0.28, 1.27, 99
3. 0.30, 1.82, 152
4. 0.20, 1.23, 103
5. 0.10, 0.89, 79
6. 0.30, 1.52, 122
7. 0.23, 1.04, 81
8. 0.32, 1.81, 149
9. 0.20, 1.15, 95
10. 0.68, 1.71, 103
11. 0.25, 1.15, 90
12. 0.49, 1.86, 137
13. 0.21, 0.98, 77
14. 0.28, 1.61, 133
15. 0.24, 1.05, 81
16. 0.40, 1.60, 120
17. 0.26, 1.43, 117
18. 0.48, 1.53, 105
19. 0.29, 1.27, 98
20. 2.14, 3.78, bad bad bad
very nice... got some fuzzing out planned do ya?
These look like a nice set of trannies, low leakage, good gains. There's a few fuzz face and tone bender sets in there!
I just might get me some of those too. ;)
Some of the Russian germaniums have an internal "shunt" resistor that makes measuring the gain accurately very difficult. The big-ass GT404 trannies don't see to have them, but the smaller flying-saucer trannies usually do.
On the other hand, the Russian trannies are generally far more modern in manufacture than the "coveted" US/UK germanium units. As a result, they tend to have lower leakage and lower failure rates. At least in my experience, that is.
IT308
1. 6, 96, 90
2. 18, 141 123
3. 10, 97, 87
4. 10, 121 111
5. 30, 156 126
6. 27, 186 159
7. 8, 88, 80
8. 15, 121 106
9. 10, 90, 80
10. 26, 156 130
11. 12, 107 95
12. 9, 98, 89
13. 20, 120 100
14. 10,112 102
15. 7, 92, 85
16. 11, 108, 97
17. 20, 133 113
18. 18, 121 103
19. 12, 95, 83
20. 17,117 100
21. 7, 97 90
22. 13, 103 90
23. 7, 114 107
24. 5, 83 78
25. 10, 112 102
26. 5, 88 83
27. 8, 111 103
28. 7, 103 96
29. 6, 77 71
30. 16, 111 95
31. 9, 84 75
32. 19, 120 101
33. 10, 103 93
34. 9, 104 95
35. 7, 82 75
36. 13, 111 98
37. 9, 90 81
38. 6, 86 80
39. 12, 107 95
40. 6, 101 95
So 40 out of 100?
It's like you're starting your own numbers station (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_station) ... :D
Yes 40 out of 100, I got tired of testing so I am taking a break for a few days. They sound great.
And no, no number station....hahaha
What about the gt402e's? do those sound good too?
wow, you are getting lucky with those gains. My last batch of tranny's (100) didnt have 1 fuzz faceable transistor.
Alright here is what I have come up with for testing all of them so far.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AiuJFraWqwPxdDdUNE5fdmRuSE95S28tc2p0ZlJ0VWc
Also, I have to correct myself. I got the 108's not the 308's
Quote from: culturejam on February 28, 2012, 03:42:40 PM
Some of the Russian germaniums have an internal "shunt" resistor that makes measuring the gain accurately very difficult. The big-ass GT404 trannies don't see to have them, but the smaller flying-saucer trannies usually do.
On the other hand, the Russian trannies are generally far more modern in manufacture than the "coveted" US/UK germanium units. As a result, they tend to have lower leakage and lower failure rates. At least in my experience, that is.
Is there a better way to test these type of transistors then? A more accurate way for our purposes?