madbeanpedals::forum

Projects => Tech Help - Projects Page => Topic started by: angrykoko on July 08, 2012, 04:30:22 PM

Title: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 08, 2012, 04:30:22 PM
So i built a boneyard, and like a couple have reported I get the sqeal when I turn either of the gain / crunch knobs past noon (even tried dropping the hi-gain pot to 1/2 value but same issue).
Used shielded wire throughout also.

Putting my boss eq pedal in front of it fixes the problem like was reported.

So I guess I'd like to build a perm input buffer into this???  Any suggestions for a buffer?  something simple and small?  Or have I missed something else to try?

Thanks!
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: murdog47 on July 08, 2012, 05:13:44 PM
Have you changed the R5 and C5 values as follows?
R5 100R
C5 1uf
That along with the pots cleared mine up
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 08, 2012, 10:01:49 PM
I didn't try that.  I read it as the 1/2 gain mod when I saw that and thought it would change the pedal into something I wasn't looking for... but, It's easy enough to try.. I think I have a 1u & 100r laying around...
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 08, 2012, 10:49:12 PM
Ok, tried it.. no change

I left RPD out, is that supposed to be jumpered (I didnt jumper it).
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 08, 2012, 11:01:59 PM
Ok, got an idea.  While testing the jumper theory with a paper clip (yeah I'm lacking some duct tape and PBR... I know)... I found that if I just put the paper clip near the input connection... or better had the 2 sides of my paper clip on either side of it... the whine stopped.  I'll re-do this bit of shielded wire and see what I get.

If that doesn't do it.. could it be something with C2 ??
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 08, 2012, 11:59:39 PM
No good with new input wire.  Tried it without the shielding connected also,  Repaced C2 with a new cap... still same squeal.

So... I have 2 working fixes... input buffer or hold a paper clip with my hand near the input connection at c2.

Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: pryde on July 09, 2012, 01:13:01 AM
So did the R5=100R and C5=1uf make no difference in the squeal?
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 09, 2012, 01:42:18 AM
Yeah, I still squeal... actually it's like a whistle now so it changed a little.
The clipping LED's are lit also while it's whistling.
I measured all the resistors and they all read the right values.



Here's a pic of where it sits currently
(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-SbbXCBKDTsE/T_ozIMoZZaI/AAAAAAAAAAk/SH1YFI-7KkA/s800/IMAG0225.jpeg)
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: pryde on July 09, 2012, 03:41:14 AM
Hmm.

Is the IC a 1044 SCPA?
It looks like your C5 cap is not polarized (not sure if that matters)
Is sheiled cable only grounded at one end?

How about trying a 50k crunch and 250k hi-gain pot as well?

My pedal is all the above and I only get "a little" whistle on high gain at full clockwise?

I also notice the volume control will effect the squeal factor. Try to make sure the pedal is at unity or slightly above. Otherwise ???
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: juansolo on July 09, 2012, 08:19:30 AM
Simple and small buffer:

(http://juansolo.demon.co.uk/stompage/schematics/Misc/KlonBufferVero.jpg)

Full thread here (http://www.madbeanpedals.com/forum/index.php?topic=1507.0). I'll let you know if it works as I'll give it a go tonight and see if it cures mine. If so it'll be going in permanently.
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 09, 2012, 10:18:48 AM
Quote from: pryde on July 09, 2012, 03:41:14 AM
Hmm.

Is the IC a 1044 SCPA?
It looks like your C5 cap is not polarized (not sure if that matters)
Is sheiled cable only grounded at one end?

How about trying a 50k crunch and 250k hi-gain pot as well?

My pedal is all the above and I only get "a little" whistle on high gain at full clockwise?

I also notice the volume control will effect the squeal factor. Try to make sure the pedal is at unity or slightly above. Otherwise ???

Yep, it's the SCPA version.
C5 used to be a polarized 2.2uf (that one in the pic is the 1u)
Yes, shielded wire grounded only at one end.
I dont have a lot of spare pots around, that's why I only could try dropping the high gain one down to 500K

As far as volume, It didn't seem to make much difference where it was set.

Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 09, 2012, 10:20:37 AM
Quote from: juansolo on July 09, 2012, 08:19:30 AM
Simple and small buffer:

(http://juansolo.demon.co.uk/stompage/schematics/Misc/KlonBufferVero.jpg)

Full thread here (http://www.madbeanpedals.com/forum/index.php?topic=1507.0). I'll let you know if it works as I'll give it a go tonight and see if it cures mine. If so it'll be going in permanently.

Awsome!  I think I may have all those parts around even.  Thank you !
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 09, 2012, 10:27:42 AM
So I'm curious about my paper clip deal.

The pedal has to be fully connected (guitar->pedal->amp) for this to work.
I do not have to be touching the guitar strings (grounded)
and all I do is hold a paper clip that's bent into a tight upside down "U" shape near (not touching anything) the "IN" connection solder point. 

Why would that cure the squeal & whistle?
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: juansolo on July 09, 2012, 10:54:44 AM
Quote from: angrykoko on July 09, 2012, 10:27:42 AM
So I'm curious about my paper clip deal.

The pedal has to be fully connected (guitar->pedal->amp) for this to work.
I do not have to be touching the guitar strings (grounded)
and all I do is hold a paper clip that's bent into a tight upside down "U" shape near (not touching anything) the "IN" connection solder point. 

Why would that cure the squeal & whistle?

Grounding the input through you maybe?
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 09, 2012, 11:35:03 AM
Quote from: juansolo on July 09, 2012, 10:54:44 AM
Quote from: angrykoko on July 09, 2012, 10:27:42 AM
So I'm curious about my paper clip deal.

The pedal has to be fully connected (guitar->pedal->amp) for this to work.
I do not have to be touching the guitar strings (grounded)
and all I do is hold a paper clip that's bent into a tight upside down "U" shape near (not touching anything) the "IN" connection solder point. 

Why would that cure the squeal & whistle?

Grounding the input through you maybe?

Oops... in better light (and with my reading glasses) I see it's not the input pad... its R1! which is right next to the input pad.

Here's what I did this time.
Connect pedal fully (guitar->pedal->amp),  clip one end of a jumper to pedals ground, take other end and touch it to R1's case... whistle gone!    Could be R4 also, they are so close together that this trick may be affecting both.  The whistle lessens the closer you get to R1 then all gone once you make contact.

My jumper is just a normal alligator clip on both ends with regular wire between type of jumper, I was not touching bare metal this time.
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: juansolo on July 09, 2012, 05:58:32 PM
I have no clue why this works (as it looks like there already is a buffer in the first stage of this circuit), but running a buffer on the input has removed the squeal from mine too. Though bear in mind mine was build with the Bonyard v1 recommended parts, it didn't squeal quite as much in the first place. Tried the klon buffer and settled on a JFET buffer purely as it was smaller still (though a little less transparent) and I didn't have much space left in my enclosure. Both work, the klon one would be preferable out of the two really.
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 09, 2012, 06:54:58 PM
Quote from: juansolo on July 09, 2012, 05:58:32 PM
I have no clue why this works (as it looks like there already is a buffer in the first stage of this circuit), but running a buffer on the input has removed the squeal from mine too. Though bear in mind mine was build with the Bonyard v1 recommended parts, it didn't squeal quite as much in the first place. Tried the klon buffer and settled on a JFET buffer purely as it was smaller still (though a little less transparent) and I didn't have much space left in my enclosure. Both work, the klon one would be preferable out of the two really.
Cool!

So you used the buffer you posed in this thread?  I think I have all those parts around even.

Did you by chance try my jumper trick with R1?  Would be nice to know if it works for anyone else.
I'm going to keep playing around with some shielding around R1 before I build the buffer; less parts in the end are less for me to screw up  ;D
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: juansolo on July 09, 2012, 07:17:12 PM
Well I shoved an unstomped Klone on the front of it which is the same thing. I actually ended up using a simple JFET buffer. Mainly because I'm lazy and it was in a box of built boards ;) But also because it was fractionally smaller and fit in the box easier.

The Klon buffer is more transparent though, so if you can make it fit, use that one.

Again, I still have no idea why this works... All sorts of weirdness happening today. Plugging two cherrybombs together causes the one down the line to drop a load of output, unless you crank the gain when it goes the other way and it's louder than the one on the front. I expect something is very wrong with one of them as it'd doing this when the other pedal isn't stomped!

I'll be taking over a 3rd cherry bomb to test shortly to see if we can narrow it down to one pedal then figure out what's wrong with it.
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: mgwhit on July 09, 2012, 10:34:58 PM
Does anyone think that having R4 (from the primary gain stage feedback loop) running parallel right next to R1 (input resistor) might be what's causing the out of control whine that's so heavily documented on this particular board?  I don't know jack about laying out boards (and i certainly don't want to dis Bean), but I've heard that parallel traces can influence each other and I can imagine how this could cause nasty feedback in this position.  Maybe angrykoko's jumper is sending the potential interference to ground, and that's what's stopping the feedback.  And maybe using an input buffer changes the impedance enough that R1 is less susceptible to picking up the interference.

I fear I'm just talking out of my butt and revealing my ignorance of electronics simultaneously, but I have bread boarded this circuit at full gain and it worked like a charm.  I feel like we might have a chance to fix something here, like what went on with the Creamy Dreamer specs on the Mud bunny last week.  Thoughts?
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 09, 2012, 11:52:33 PM
I think your on to something.

When I got home from work I used something with a smaller area than the alligator clip's tip to try to narrow it down a bit and found that I had to be between the 2 resistors for the best result but, would come back when I cranked the pedals volume.

So then I came up with this dumb contraption... It is the quietest of my tests YET.. I can even crank the volume on the pedal with no whine.

Dont laugh too much.. yeah it's scotch taped tinfoil with a pice of wire taped to it running to ground ;D
But it's between the 2 resistors and it works!


(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-IXtXIaIjWhU/T_tsu4AgluI/AAAAAAAAAA4/WTyBkiagQas/s800/IMAG0229.jpeg)
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: alanp on July 10, 2012, 01:08:06 AM
Cheapest mu-metal you ever seen.

Glad to hear you got it going right! The old Trainwreck amps were supposed to be pigs in terms of high gain wire-wrangling.
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: oldhousescott on July 10, 2012, 01:17:37 AM
Good find! R1 isn't strictly necessary, you could remove it and jumper the pads for R1 and RPD that are closest to each other. Or you could just replace R1 with a jumper.

And I can attest to the Trainwreck being layout critical. Squeals like stuck pig if it isn't just so.
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: pryde on July 10, 2012, 01:38:33 AM
Wow. this looks promising for a logical fix to the whine. As said, mine is all but gone but certain pickups with hi-gain can still envoke some whistle. I'm watching this one
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 10, 2012, 01:42:32 AM
And the final version for tonight.
I put C5, R5 and High Gain pot back to the original 2.2uf, 47R & 1M values.. works like a charm!

I'll hit the store tomorrow and pickup something other than tinfoil so I can solder that wire to it then add some silicone to hold it in place.  

I'm all ears if there is a beter way to do that shield?

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-qAGj2lHyd8Y/T_uG2MVQloI/AAAAAAAAABE/JKX8QoYSYn0/s800/IMAG0234.jpeg)

Cheers!
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: juansolo on July 10, 2012, 09:32:48 AM
Hey don't knock it if it works.

There certainly seems to be something on the new board that didn't afflict my old v1 Boneyard build. I'll try your shield at the weekend and disconnect my buffer if that sorts it. It won't be the first time I've ended up with comedy shielding in one of my builds...

(http://juansolo.demon.co.uk/stompage/images/frog-i.jpg)
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: angrykoko on July 10, 2012, 11:30:28 AM
Ok, the shield bugs me because it has to be glued in and it's extra wire/clutter.

How about one of these 2 ideas:
Note: both look like they will bypass RPD, you'd have to figure out a jumper for that if your using it.

1) stand R1 on end and solder the input wire directly to the end of R1 sticking up
In the pic below, de-solder the 2 in red (keep the one in green in place) stand R1 up on end.
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-GjGmd54RxrM/T_wPYDTMH-I/AAAAAAAAABQ/Yeid8FlRiAA/s800/mods.png)

2) Move R1 to foot switch.  Remove R1 and input wire.  Solder R1 to foot switch -> Solder input wire to R1 -> Solder other end of input wire to green pad above.

For #1, I remember when I was building my amp the guys on that forum told me to try to bring things in at right angles to each other to help eliminate noise... maybe that will work here?

Anyway, off to work
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: madbean on July 10, 2012, 12:25:49 PM
Quote from: mgwhit on July 09, 2012, 10:34:58 PM
Does anyone think that having R4 (from the primary gain stage feedback loop) running parallel right next to R1 (input resistor) might be what's causing the out of control whine that's so heavily documented on this particular board?

This may very well be the problem here. R1 could be removed from the board and wired from the 3PDT. Alternatively, R4 could be removed and re-wired underneath the PCB. It seems that I made a poor design choice here. I can draw up a couple of diagrams for suggestions which might eliminate the problem.
Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: pryde on July 10, 2012, 11:09:57 PM
So I was intrigued with the findings here and tried one of the potential fixes. I removed R4 and flipped it to the underside of the pcb.

Running 1M hi-gain pot with R5: 100R and C5: 1uf is DEAD quiet at full cranked high-gain. Before I has some whistle using a 500k pot at full blast.

I then put the R5 and C5 values back to stock 47R/2.2uf. The whistle/feedback returned with the high-gain pot at 10 o'clock  :(

So for me I am very happy with the R4 "fix" using 100R/1uf combo with the stock pots (100k/1M). The high-gain channel produces serious distortion, quietly and sound great. I love this pedal  ;D

Title: Re: Boneyard painfull but, ok with buffer
Post by: madbean on July 10, 2012, 11:33:58 PM
I'll collate all this info together and make an update to the doc noting the modified values, R4 fix. The current production board is slightly different than the prototype I did (which was 5 PCB mounted pots rather than four---a change I made to allow more configurations), and R4 was probably in a different position.

I appreciate all the info---you guys are getting to be some creative box builder problem solvers!!