madbeanpedals::forum

Projects => Tech Help - Projects Page => Topic started by: gitaar0 on April 06, 2013, 02:14:03 PM

Title: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 06, 2013, 02:14:03 PM
I have a ABDX with mn3005. the delay works well.
I can not get the modulation to work well.
I have a vtl5c3 for the vactrol now that replaced a ldr/led combo in hope of getting a better result.
The problem is that the delay cuts out when I turn the depth pot all the way up.
Changing r56 has some influence but it still cuts out. I have tried values in between 0-1m5 but I can not find a value that prevents the depth pot from cutting out the delay, when I set the depth pot in the almost full setting.
Changing the clock helps and then I can set a value for r56 that makes the depth pot work ok in the whole range but then when I turn the delay pot for a very short delay value and the depth pot full up the delay cuts out with the delay pot.

I have build an old Aquaboy before with the modulation add on board and had the same problem using an LDR/led combo. Never got it working well except by adding a trimpot in series with the depth pot. I could do this here to but it seems to me that that was no how it was designed. Any suggestions?
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: midwayfair on April 06, 2013, 03:09:32 PM
R56 is in parallel with the pot -- the reason it still cuts out is that it has no effect on the MINIMUM resistance of the pot (which is still 0 + the LDR's on resistance), only the maximum.

You might try just pulling R56. It's possible that your vactrol's "on" resistance is too small, and R56 is making it even smaller. From there, you should be able to find a clock setting that will work at maximum depth and minimum delay.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 06, 2013, 05:07:48 PM
Hi Jon,

Yes I thought about that too and tried it, but when i do that and set the clock where it does not cut out I have a very short delay. I could add resistance in series to the depth pot to get a higher minimum resistance, but it was not designed this way I suppose....is that due to a variation in different vactrols of the same number or am I missing something else?  Any other ideas?

Thanks
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: midwayfair on April 06, 2013, 06:26:56 PM
Quote from: gitaar0 on April 06, 2013, 05:07:48 PM
is that due to a variation in different vactrols of the same number or am I missing something else?

That I couldn't tell you, unfortunately. I understand the LFO part of this, but not so much the BBD part. Issues with LFOs swinging too far and cutting out are something I *have* dealt with. There are a handful of guys here who are wizards with with BBDs, so maybe they'll chime in with some other advice.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: madbean on April 06, 2013, 11:40:53 PM
Here's what I would do: tackle it from the LED brightness side. Socket R50 and R51 and increase their values, but keep them the same value. Start with 4k7 and see how that works. Making them the same value ensures that the LED swings full bright and dark, and the increased resistance will dim the LED a bit which should prevent the max depth from causing a problem.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 07, 2013, 01:51:26 PM
Hi brian,

Ok, I fiddled with r50 and r51. With a value of 8k2 for each and r56 removed i can set the clock anywhere without having the delay cut out at any extreme of the depth or the delay pot and with a good range of modulation. So that works. Thanks.
It is a very different value then what is in the project so I am still wondering why it so far off?
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: madbean on April 07, 2013, 05:52:01 PM
R56 is basically a kludge I added since there was room on the board. If you are using the VTL5C3 you really should not need it, and I think I was not clear about that in the build doc. My intent in putting it there was to offer some tweaking for random photocells, where light/dark resistances are way out of spec from the vactrol.

However, I'll need to check about the two resistor values. It may be that I put different values in my prototype and forgot when I did the final type-up. I'll check my proto tomorrow morning and report back. I've also been working on a second build (on a production board) as time allows so that will give me something else to compare.

Ideally, I want to get the two builds demoed so I can show everyone a comparison of the v3205 vs. the MN3005.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 09, 2013, 08:36:53 PM
Hi brian,

Did you have a chance to check those values?

Thanks
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: madbean on April 11, 2013, 07:18:23 PM
I checked. I used 1k for both. I think I will add a note to the documentation to socket these values. Are you running it a 15v or 9v for your MN3005?
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 12, 2013, 03:10:11 PM
hmm, that is quite different as I am running it on 15 volt
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: madbean on April 12, 2013, 03:49:40 PM
Okay, this is what I forgot to put in the docs. The higher supply means the voltage output on the LFO is greater, and therefore the Led it drives is brighter. When that happens, the delay pot gets pulled too far because the total resistance between the photocell and depth pot is too low when it swings to full brightness and the depth is at max. That's why higher values for the two led resistors should be used. I'll add this info to the docs.
I double checked on my v3205/9v build and the 1k there works fine. 6k8 to 10k is better for the 15v supplies.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: juansolo on April 13, 2013, 06:51:31 PM
Put mine together today (15v MN3005) and had the same prob with the LFO locking up. I went with a pair of 8k2 resistors and it worked fine. Really nice sounding thing this! As usual, it's gone in the box of boards awaiting an enclosure, so it'll be a while before it appears in build reports.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: aballen on April 13, 2013, 10:58:47 PM
hmm, I just built mine today, also running at 15V.  The modulation on one side can get pretty wacky, is this the same thing you guys are seeing?  I wouldn't mine my modulation being a little smoother.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: aballen on April 13, 2013, 11:21:35 PM
I don't seem to have any 8k2, closest is 5k6 or 10k.  is 10 k too high
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: madbean on April 14, 2013, 12:47:07 AM
The square wave modulation is going to be pretty wild. The triangle wave is smooth.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 15, 2013, 05:51:04 AM
Great that this is sorted out. In the meantime I had alraedy figured out the effect of the 15 volt might be the problem or part of it. I glad that is confirmed.

Thanks, Brian
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 27, 2013, 06:39:23 PM
When turned down the deph pot still has quite a bit of depth.
Is there a way to make the minimum lower? Resistor paralell to the ldr?
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: madbean on April 27, 2013, 07:19:59 PM
Same thing: increase R50 and R51, but keep them identical values. This will shift the max depth value down, though. Alternatively, you could go up to 250k or 500k on the Depth pot to keep the same max depth and decrease the min depth.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 27, 2013, 07:28:37 PM
Had tried increasing r50 and r51 already. Went up to 12k.
Although it had an influence on the min depth there was not much change compared to the 8k5 i had there.
What did change was the amount of depth. The higher vakue the lower the deph left.
I will try the different pot value.

I'll let you know.

Thanks.
marc
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 29, 2013, 03:27:55 PM
250k for the depth pot with r50 and r51 8k5 works ok.


Another question.
I have the delay biased right. The mix pot has now a unity at around 10 o'clock.
What can i do best:
-lower the input to the bbd's to get an even cleaner delay. How?
-change the value of r38
-change the mixpot to 50k log or to 100k?

Next question:
With a double delay board it works with 3 mn3005s.
I have used the double delay board for the original aquayboy wih the values for that.
When biased right the delay is very loud and has oscillation very early in the feedback pot.
The last thing makes sence as the delay is loud. What to adjust here?

Thanks.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: madbean on April 29, 2013, 04:59:11 PM
Quote from: gitaar0 on April 29, 2013, 03:27:55 PM
What can i do best:
-lower the input to the bbd's to get an even cleaner delay. How?
Try a higher value resistor for R55 and/or R27. It may help.
-change the value of r38
Increase the value of R38 to move unity gain closer to the 12ock position.
-change the mixpot to 50k log or to 100k?
Changing it to 50kA will shift the unity position as well. Using 100k might actually make the problem worse.

Next question:
With a double delay board it works with 3 mn3005s.
I have used the double delay board for the original aquayboy wih the values for that.
When biased right the delay is very loud and has oscillation very early in the feedback pot.
The last thing makes sence as the delay is loud. What to adjust here?
Increase R39 to move the oscillation point on the Feedback pot, or use a higher value pot for the T1 trimmer.

Thanks.
Title: Re: ABDX modulation
Post by: gitaar0 on April 29, 2013, 06:10:45 PM
I changed the trimpot t1 to 100k.
That did not help much. Suggestions?

Changed r38 to 100k and now unity is at noon.

Quote from: madbean on April 29, 2013, 04:59:11 PM
Quote from: gitaar0 on April 29, 2013, 03:27:55 PM
What can i do best:
-lower the input to the bbd's to get an even cleaner delay. How?
Try a higher value resistor for R55 and/or R27. It may help.
-change the value of r38
Increase the value of R38 to move unity gain closer to the 12ock position.
-change the mixpot to 50k log or to 100k?
Changing it to 50kA will shift the unity position as well. Using 100k might actually make the problem worse.

Next question:
With a double delay board it works with 3 mn3005s.
I have used the double delay board for the original aquayboy wih the values for that.
When biased right the delay is very loud and has oscillation very early in the feedback pot.
The last thing makes sence as the delay is loud. What to adjust here?
Increase R39 to move the oscillation point on the Feedback pot, or use a higher value pot for the T1 trimmer.

Thanks.