The transistors in question are ones that I measured and offered to sell.
I am using a Peak Atlas and a large number of these 2N1305's I have read "0" leakage, though some do show a very small amount from like 5uA to 40uA.
The only other time I have seen this is with Russian germaniums.
So, after some private messaging and reading comments on this thread I am wondering if these devices may be faulty.
What I think is happening is that the leakage is just very low in these devices. The Peak Atlas displays leakage in mA, where RG Keen's suggestions for Fuzz Face devices are referred to in uA. So, I am thinking that the Peak Atlas just isn't picking it up. In other words, if there is actually 5uA of leakage, then the Peak Atlas would show 0.005mA, which may be outside of parameters of the meter to display. So, perhaps anything under 10uA will read 0.00mA leakage on the tester. Now, I would imagine that if I tested the same device on RG Keens test circuit, I would see a little leakage, but not much. I have not tested these particular devices using both methods, but may set up RG Keens circuit this weekend if I have time and experiment.
One of the cool features about the Peak Atlas is that it will tell you if the device being tested is ge or si and NPN or PNP. The 2N1305's DO show they are PNP germanium on the Peak Atlas.
I don't know. What do you guys think? Anyone here with a better understanding of the Peak Atlas works that may be able to shed some light here?
Thanks!
Jared